Friday, June 17, 2011
Emotional Independence – Part II
When two people get attracted to each other, it can be something that is in the other person that you may be agreeing upon or something that you have been looking for and have not found it in yourself or elsewhere. What you have found can be physical or intellectual or sometime even materialistic.
In our subconscious we all know that physical and material is not what we are looking for. In most cases, it is our superficial senses that make us look for them first and make us commit to a relationship based on them.
When you connect with someone intellectually, chances are high that the emotion that comes out of you is genuine, natural or maybe we can call “your native“emotion. In connection primarily based on physical or material attractions the chances are high to produce an emotion that is totally acquired and unnatural, based on what you have seen around and felt left without.
Human beings are so advanced that we can never find any identical intellects. The basic of our evolution is stimulation. If we don’t get enough stimulation we saturate and go dull.
In a relationship, two may connect in many things but not all things. For example, medical Doctor in relationship with a person whose profession is art may still connect in a lot of things and feel the emotional high. The more emotional highs you have the more stimulated and evolving you are going to be. There can be certain things in which one may not understand the other. In those cases both must be open enough and shed the insecurities and let the other person to seek the emotional high elsewhere.
We get too attached to everything that we have including our relationship and that only stops us to grow as collective creatures. This again has to be blamed on our bonding with culture and society that is as old as time. Imagine, if a painter marries a passionate machine operator in a chemical plant who has got no idea of what painting is. They may have something to talk about to get their emotional connection but what about a lot of inspirations that the painter is getting while painting. Where or with whom will he/she share about it if the partner is going to feel insecure when the painter has a passionate and emotional discussion in private with someone else?
The maturity that we need is to free our partners from our emotional leach and let them get an emotional independence to go and have a passionate, intellectual connection with whomever they are getting that emotional high and stimulation.
The society has only given us the feeling of Guilt when we feel free.
-- Satish
Emotional Independence – Part I
Like a piece of wood we are pulled by the sheer force of the culture or Society River that our ancestors have started in some hill side or a cave. All our actions are purely orchestrated reactions based on what our surroundings have thought us. Lot of great philosophers describe our plight as a puppet tied to one end of a string whose other end is with an unknown force commonly called as god.
My belief is that we all have just made puppets out of ourselves. We have deliberately tied ourselves to many strings not one. We didn’t stop there. We have given the other end of that string to known man made forces called, social responsibilities and compulsions.
Think about this. Born free we are. Then we learn a lot of things from our surroundings and slowly we start believing that this is the way to go as almost all goats are going that way. In all the troubles that we encounter till we walk this earth, we only console ourselves saying that what we are going through is only common. Never would we think why we should go through this. Why should anyone go through this?
Examples: Religion, Education, Profession, Ethics, Morals, Survival, Marriage ........the list is long.
Why can’t we just be honest to ourselves and do what our conscience is telling us? We do everything as expected by others and be frustrated. If you are trying to do everything to please others then we must be pleased seeing others pleased. If that is not the case, then we must start living in the way that will please us and not care about others. Easier said than done. I know. Though I talk a lot about being free, I am still an obedient societal creature.
Since our birth we have been taught to be strictly boundary oriented and not to cross that and do whatever you want within that boundary as long as you satisfy these two million rules. May be that is why we started imagining our almighty as boundless which will make him/her so admirable and desirable.
May be, someone reading all my articles may call me an antisocial! I can’t disagree with them.
--Satish
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Guilt
In the area of emotional science, this law still applies. For every action of ours there will be, if not equal, some opposite reaction. This is not something anyone needs to be taught. Almost everybody in this small world of ours knows this by the time they reach the age of two. Our great society, creation of ours, has taught us so many things. The top of this is "Morality"; What is good and what is bad in the eyes of this society. It doesn’t teach us, anymore, how to perform the good and how to avoid the bad so that we don’t become an outcast.
Actually we did have those centres that were teaching us how to lead the path of good and avoid the bad patches in that path. Those were called Gurukuls. There, all young children go through a tough learning curve where they learn how behave in various situation and how to be balanced in reacting to various situations. By the time, they graduate from the gurukul, they come out as well nurtured beings no matter what your actual nature was. So, the people were actually grounded and they mostly know what to do in various situations. Living was mostly smooth in those days.
Then when the world became a place that accommodates a lot of adventurous explorers, there came a phase where people started exchanging philosophies and mix of culture. The gurukul still existed but the rolls were rolling downwards. People started sending their children to be trained in other philosophies. This opened the ground where there were different kinds of people nurtured in different ways and they reacted to situations differently. An atmosphere prevailed where people were constantly confused because of other’s action and at times, they made mistakes in other’s eyes.
In my view, only during these days we acquired one of the most negative emotions that we posses today – Guilt. As we know there is going to be a reaction for our actions, we should think before the action and prepare ourselves on how we are going to face the consequence (reactions) of our action. Instead we just give in to the pressure and we act without thinking. The feeling that you get the moment you find out that what you did is wrong in some one’s eyes is guilt. The feeling of guilt is something that kills the joy of any action. We have to gear ourselves up to a position where we are ready to face the consequence and not feel guilty to any of our actions. That will be the next stage of evolution of the human emotions.
That means we always think before we act. Even when we commit a murder if we have gone through a thought process before committing it and considering all the consequences, we can commit it in an artistic manner and derive immense pleasure from it. Otherwise even after having a tasty chocolate we would end up feeling as if we have stolen some one’s last meal.
--Satish
Evolution
Why did I write the first paragraph? Okay. Now, replace the natural environment with our societal environment. Though the change was constant even in this, it was very slow and the people who existed then could absorb the change easily as the changes were not visible in one's lifetime.
Again, recently we have been breaking the speed barriers in this too. This is pushing a lot of our characteristics/qualities to extinction. High time we do something to help each other in identifying those qualities and try and restore them.
May be we can call this phenomenon as evolution of human evolution.
-- Satish
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Mediocrity as Benchmark
At times I wonder why we are celebrating something that is just as expected. This applies to anything in the world now;
• An artist performing quality art • A government delivering a service
• A cop being honest • A politician talking truth
If you look at it, all the above are just part of the duty they have to perform. My feeling is that, centuries long nepotism is the reason for this loss in quality.
When a group of people who by chance get entertained by an art that they were never introduced to before, they appreciate the performance. This makes the performer famous. Once a person is famous, a circle is formed around him/her and all they do is just sing praises of the performance no matter what quality comes out. These things happens only when someone start performing to a set of audience who are clueless to what they are watching.
This is the very reason why the artists in ancient times only perform for a set of people who can really understand what is being performed. In those days, when the audience does not get what they expected from the performance they just leave without wasting time. This slowly makes the artist not so reputed. So, to maintain their reputation, the artists maintain their quality and when they keep improving on their performance, they get appreciated. This shows that it was more art centric than the artist centric in those days.
In contrast, today, it has become more artists centric. Like I said initially, once the artist becomes famous for whatever reason, they go into a cocoon and the team around them always say what the artist likes to hear and if there is any genuine criticism, it is looked at as an attack. Here the quality (if any) saturates very early and even the audience are pretty much happy to be a viewer of the performer than the performance.
This applies to others too. When government after government does not deliver and they have a media which still sings praise of them then when some government delivers it becomes the golden era where as they have just delivered what is their duty as a government.
May be in the passage of time the humans have also changed to some extent. From concentrating on demanding what we rightly deserve we have started concentrating more on mere criticisms.
-- Satish
Monday, August 2, 2010
Purely Rhetoric
This is our first step to become so called civilised. So, what I can see here is, to be civilised is, to lose peace and go on the offence.
So, this so called way of being civilised has transformed into a way of life these days and we humans have started to survive not by merely being alive but by controlling the “others”. “Others” are still the same; nature or animal or fellow humans.
The animals have no choice but to perish. The nature is too complicated to control. It is baffling that we, the so called the most advanced of the life forms never realised for 40 to 50 years that when we dig a deep hole on earth’s surface for energy, the consequence is a similar hole in the atmosphere.
The humans are not very different from one of their greatest inventions – Robot. We live in a way that has been collectively considered to be the way to live. Strangely, what is collectively accepted is mostly framed by a very few. We go by our day to day life just as expected from us. Not by ourselves but by the principles drilled into our head from our childhood. What is good and what is bad is “preached” to us and we decide on situations based on the preaching. We formed a lot of religions and subsets of it but you cannot choose anything easily because you are always born into them. So, how different are we from Robots.
Humans, by nature cannot work independently. They always need a leader. Even that leader is a robot (may be the defective ones) who would have got instructions from whoever has nurtured him/her. To put it in simple terms, ‘we needed a leader like M.K Gandhi to become free from British only to hand our leash over to so called democratic set up.
How different is democracy from being ruled by a king if you cannot be a part of framing your constitution?????
What is the point I am trying to make here???????? Just like you I am also scratching my head hard.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Wondering!!!
The winter has started and it has gotten very cold. So we went shopping for appropriate clothing. There was a jacket which looked nice and I was happy to part with my precious earnings for it. The moment I saw what was written on the back of the jacket, I became sceptical in going for it. My wife however said that it is cute and I should buy it.
"Angel at night" is what was written on it. I said no and went on and searched others and didnt like any. At last I just told myself. "Whatever" let me just buy it and what’s written on my back does not really matter as long as the jacket is going to keep me warm.
How the life has changed for me; and how I have become comfortable doing things which were totally against my will just a few years back. The interesting thing is I never took any effort to change.
So, here I am. "Angel at Night"; dont have any wings though.
--Satish
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Coins are not the only two sided entity
What puts the humans on top of the pyramid of different life forms is the ability to think and analyse the past, improvise current and formulate future actions. It’s not the intelligence itself but the level of it puts humans far ahead of other life forms on earth in terms of advancement.
This level of intelligence does not come alone. It is packaged in such a way that, to be humans, by nature is to seek for pleasure and comfort; these are driven by body and mind. The humans use their intelligence as a tool to procure the pleasure required to satiate the body and mind.
Let us see the most obvious first; the bodily pleasure. To live, we just need food. By nature our body will direct us to get the right nutrition and our intelligence will be used to get it. This level of Intelligence is there in all life forms. That is how the humans were living initially. Here, ours faithfully, “The Intelligence” started using its attribute smartness. It didn’t stop with just seeking the required nutrition; it also found that the nutrition are not available round the year and found a way to stock for future. Then came the others, the liking for taste and it resulted in a lot of variety of food we have today (no complaints for that). This made them to farm. Farming cannot be done by one person so started to create community and in a community started creating all the rules and now, you can see what is going on around us and with us. Any species, by nature indulge in reproduction to save itself from extinction. That instinct was also manipulated by our intelligence to reproduce not just for survival as a species but to make the community bigger, to make it stronger.
So, next is the pleasure of mind. As we saw the attribute of intelligence: greed taking us through various developments, the mind actually is in the background of all these. The pleasure for mind in most cases comes out of satisfying the body. Whatever we feel is required, once procured, the mind is satisfied. When the body needs food, a tasty one, once achieved, the mind is satisfied. The problem here is, a satisfied mind is then manipulated by intelligence. The intelligence instructs the mind to instruct the body to seek for more of those that satisfies the body and we get addicted to it. It can be so many things: Food, physical interactions or even at times seeking emotional connections with others. This ends us in relationships and then brews complications attached to it.
We just end up calling most of our actions as achievements whereas, if one looks closely, we are only overcoming the problems previously created by us.
Anyway, what I am wondering is, what is the point in doing so many things. Eating, working, sex, love, hate, war, inventions and so on. To be born itself is a terminal disease so what is the point of being here? Is this intelligence a Boon or a Sin as it also make us think and thinking at times just confuses us.
The conformist/Optimist:
When I woke up early this morning, it was too dark and was stumbling on the toys of my son and was lucky to reach for the switch and here we go, there is light. Humans by nature are not as good as many animals in seeing in darkness. The humans though posses the power of turning off the darkness and flood a space with light. What an invention is this electric light. We have made such advancement in a very short span of existence in this world. When people started dying of disease, we have got a lot of advancement in the medical area to live a healthy life. Though a lot of animals arrived on this world much before humans, their life expectancy has not changed or in certain cases, they have just vanished incapable of surviving the climatic changes but we humans, have reached an average life expectancy of 60 to 70 and in some cases even 90 or 100 where in when we started it was a mere 40 to 45. Our intelligence level has really left every other life form far behind. We have also become so powerful and our natural character, empathy, has come in to save a lot of species from extinction. Today I can talk to my friends and relatives far away whenever I want to. We have already travelled to moon and planning trips to Mars and some large sized asteroids.
Recently I read a research that said that the fertility level in men has gone down drastically and if this trend continues, men will be totally infertile in 120,000 years this got me worried. In few days after that I read another article that said that a group of scientist has successfully created a sperm cell from a man’s stem cell. They also said that it is not far away that they will make a sperm from a stem cell of a woman. These are amazing achievements in bio technology. Though we have speeded up the warming of our planet, we also have the intelligence to find out what has caused it and take steps to tackle it. The most crucial achievement of humans is the ability to adapt. Adapt with physical environment, adapt and tackle with the emotions shown by fellow humans, to form an ally and to form a community to survive together.
I just feel that I am very lucky to be a human and to be in the era of unravelling. The intelligence that we have got is really a tool to advancement, survival and a window to future.
--Satish
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Family Politics
Tamil Cinema has been tagged as 'Kollywood' (referring to Kodambakkam) to make it sound similar to world's biggest (in monetory terms) cinema - Hollywood. What I have realised by seeing what’s happening in recent times is maybe we should rename KOLLYWOOD as GOLLYWOOD (referring to Gopalpuram).
By looking at the amount of market share this family has in the industry, I think that will be an apt name. Every big movie is released by them and most of the times they also end up producing it. Actually, who else have got so much money in these days to produce big films.
Now, if you look at the perks the cine industry has been getting from the TN Govenrment, it makes sense because, this family has invested so much in the industry. It’s like a pvt company run by this family and they are taking care of their employees. The only thing is they are taking care of their employees with the tax payer's money.
Here is where I see a Pseudo democracy. Because they have the control of media and entertainment and they decide what people can hear or see. If you say you don’t like the movie produced by them or their channels or Newspaper, then you will be branded as non-thamizh or anti-thamizh or here is the best – you will be called anti 'Dravidian'.
May be I am a bit paranoid but really I feel soon there will be a day where the election for the assembly will be happening but the voters will only be from this family and they decide who the chief and other ministers and MLAs are. The election commission will be just getting notified. This can be called a very highly refined Pseudo Democracy. (At least the billions of money spent on elections can be saved).
Am I being a sceptic? May be yes, but this is honestly what my feelings are. This family will say I have this feeling not because I am sceptic but because of my origins.
Anyway, I don’t want to lose my self proclaimed Devil’s Advocate tag. So, I say - at lease the people working in the film industry and the “houses” of this family are benefitting.
-- Satish
Friday, February 19, 2010
My Name is Khan and I am not for everybody!
Hi Everybody
After nearly a year and a half I played cricket last Saturday afternoon. Trying to move my rusted joints in the process was only compounded by the excellent lunch I had just had, at my friend’s place. Anyway, that day was full of fun from morning till we finished our cricket session late in the afternoon. If anybody, it was only me, who can spoil it from then on. And to my disbelief, I did it. I spoiled all the good experiences I had on that day. Yes. I made a decision to go and watch My Name is Khan.
Though not a great SRK or Karan Johar fan, I went to the movie without prejudice. We could only get the tickets on the first row. Convenient though, as Nimalan slept in Kshama’s lap and she was sitting on the floor for the whole movie.
To be honest, I was not disappointed in the initial stage as it was neither a usual SRK movie nor a usual Karan Johar movie. It was an honest and a genuine attempt when Rizwan Khan narrates his childhood. The ‘Ammi’, the sons the town were all believable. The way Ammi explains the good and the bad to Rizwan is impressive. The performances of SRK, Kajol, the small boy were very good and even the rest of the cast has done justice for their character.
Rizwan has a type of autism. He is very intelligent and a very idealistic person. His younger brother is studious and ends up in the US through his hard work. He, however has a problem with his mother because she spends most of her time on Rizwan. On mother’s death, he calls rizwan to the US and live with him. There Rizwan meets Mandira (Kajol), who is a divorced and living as a single mother. She has to marry Rizwan as he is the hero. I am telling this because, there is no romance shown between them and we could only see that Mandira is only ok to see Rizwan every day. Then Mandira’s son gets killed in a post 9/11 racist attack in his school.
Mandira assumes that it is because of his newly acquired surname ‘Khan’ and has a spat with Rizwan and the fight ends up Rizwan taking up a journey which will only end when he meets the president of the US and tell him that ‘My name is Khan and I am not a Terrorist’.
May be I am dumb, but honestly, I don’t understand if that journey was Rizwan to tell the president how he feels or is that solely to get back to Mandira.
Phew! I think I narrated the whole story to you. It sounds interesting isn’t it?. Well, it was, for me till certain point and then it became too monotonous and the story that was worth only 90mins just goes on and on and at a stage I started thinking about what to do next week end.
The scene in which the president leaves and then comes back just to meet Rizwan was too much for me to digest.
As always, I would appreciate anybody’s attempt to make a soup but not the soup itself if it is not palatable.
Anyway, this is purely my own view after watching this movie. Just go and watch the movie for your own view on that. If you make a clone out of me and ask the clone to watch the movie, most probably, he will not.
Satish
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
The Culture Thrust
So I was sitting in the front passenger seat and biting off the toasted Rye bread and listening to Radio.
With my pot belly, my sitting posture and listening to the radio, I would have looked like Garfield (not sobers).
What we were hearing on the radio was pretty serious. It was about muti killing in South Africa. In other words, killing people in name of sacrifice to the god or ancestors (we can relate it to pilly sooniyam). The guy in the radio was interviewing an anthropologist who is doing his research on this so called traditional Doctors (Sangoma). The interviewer was prompting the researcher to term all these as crime as it involves killing humans at some cases and the researcher was tactfully resisting it.
I just started thinking. Why not I be the Devil's Advocate (ha! I love that term) here and asked a couple of questions to Kshama. Why is it called bad? Why can't they leave this people alone and let their society deal with this in their own way.
It may sound outrageous but think about it. All the law and the so called ethics and the life style that most country have at present is very heavily influenced by Europeans. These guys have set their foot on every nation in the name of exploration and expeditions and slowly started occupying all these country and just did not stop there. They started influencing the local people and made them believe that they are inferior and also made them accept that the European way of living and culture is the right thing to do and what the locals do is Barbaric and Uncivilised. I think 'Civilised' has become the most inappropriately used (or abused) word.
I do agree that killing someone in the name of sacrifice is a bit extreme and not so good. But, in the hindsight, am I telling this because I have been brought up in a certain way and made to believe certain things from a very young age?
Same way the locals will have their own way of living. To thrust our way on them is going to be OK for now as they believe your way is the way. Once they have had enough, it will be really bad for everybody.
India also had these things (killing people in name of sacrifice) but there was always a social resistance for this even before the British came. Here when the European came it was not as organised as India. And keeping the locals isolated and making them live their own life and not mixing with them only made these traditions to live longer.
When the apartheid fell and ANC took over, the new constitution was framed. Again, heavily based on the European way of living.
Instead of totally criticising the traditional doctors and criminalising them blindly, shouldn't they be counselled and made more aware of the current government and constitution that has been adopted by majority of people and the consequences of their acts?
I think this discussion is valid for any country not just South Africa and for any cultural happening not just human sacrifice. (Just want to emphasise that human sacrifice is just one thing that we are discussing here but there are a lot of other culture specific activities that are termed taboo just because we are not familiar with it).
Anyway, to end it, I am not encouraging or trying to justify the killings. Like I implied earlier, I am just trying to see the world without the filter provided by my upbringing.
--- Satish
Monday, January 4, 2010
3 Idiots is Worth Watching
Anyway, to be honest, I had tears of laughter in my eyes while watching this movie and had to work hard to control the noise coming out of my laughter because my son was sleeping in the next room. Thanks to the makers of this movie to strart this New Year with a lot of laughter. I have never laughed so much since the Munnabhais.
This movie has created history in collection but I would still rate it below the two Munnabhai movies.
In fact, this movie has similarities to the MBBS movie. There is a comic strict Principal who has to learn his lesson. The hero falls in love with the principal's daughter. The principal keeps missing the target every time he tries to wrong the hero. The comic sidekicks of Munnabai are converted into co-students here. The 'Jadoo Ki Jhappi' has become 'All Izz Well'. Like Munnabhai awakens the brain dead Anand Bhai, Rancho makes the new born cry and kick like Jet-Li with 'All Izz Well'.
Again, to be honest, all these came and vanished from my mind when I watched the movie as the next scene would have made me laugh my stomach out.
Aamir had limited scope to showcase his acting talent but he was great. Kareena was just there and has nothing significant to do. Bomman Irani is brilliant as usual. Madhavan and Sharman also did their role well. The fourth Idiot, Omi Vaidya was also very good.
The movie has a good message. Its the creative freedom that is not 'freely' available for the youth of India. Like Ranchod says, We make students who make great grades but we lack in researchers and inventors. Its a very healthy dig at our education system.
I'd rather not elaborate on the plot any more as it has to be watched with fresh pair of eyes to get the most out of it.
Just go and watch the movie with a sole movtive to laugh. You will be more than satisfied.
PS: Be prepared to see Aamir and Madavan as Engineering college students.
--Satish
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Avatar
Biting the bait thrown by the media and well made trailer, I went and watched Avatar. Well, to say frankly, if you have seen the Thamizh movie Vietnam Colony (I think it was also a remake of a Malayalam movie), you will see Avatar’s similarity to it. This one is a very expensive version though. Surprising it is, considering the economic slowdown all over.
Like Prabhu, in Vietnam colony, the hero of this movie is also sent into a community as a mole. Only here, the community lives in a different planet (actually, a moon called Pandora) as opposed to a colony in the Thamizh version.
He has to give inside information to a set of greedy people, and eventually help them in throwing the natives (called Na’vi) out of their home. The home in this case, is a huge tree and underneath the tree is the richest deposit of Utonium, a mineral, can be mined and sold back on earth for a million dollar a Kilo. This guy does his work initially by passing the info. As time pass by, he ends up liking the people, the nature. He doesn’t stop there. He goes on and falls in love with the chief’s daughter. And Of course, she reciprocates.
This makes him to turn against the people who sent him there and fight against them to protect the natives. Obviously, he wins in the end.
On the positive side, I can see how fertile Cameroon’s imagination is, on seeing how he has conceived the world of Navi. The small Jelly like creatures, the 7 foot tall Navi and the tree on which they live on. I particularly liked the scene which shows how they sleep. Cool stuff. The computer graphics is so good that the animated characters look very real. Amazing, how these guys stretch technology to the extreme to provide such an experience. All this in 3D. This kept me fascinated for first half an hour. Then I am done with it.
The next two hours was so boring and to make it interesting I started looking at the similarities of the scenes in Thamizh movies. This guy has to go through the process of choosing a dragon. It is not easy though. The way he does it reminds me of the old MGR movies where our Thalaivar has to prove his masculinity by taming a bull (‘Kaalai’) in one of the scenes. In this movie it is the Dragon that has to be tamed though. Then in another scene, they try Vittal Aachariya. The actual body of a scientist is kept near the Navi version of her and they try to transfer the life (“Koodu vittu Koodu Paayardhu”).
This made me think why our Captain can’t have this much fund and do a Computer Graphics rich movie in 3D and watched by people in I-Max. We will see people in the front rows dodging Captain’s back kick. At times they will also dodge captain’s “flat” tummy. And, those red, angry eyes of Captain in Close Up will terrorise everybody and make Spielberg rue about the money he wasted in making a close up shot of a T-Rec in Jurassic Park.
Anyway, if you ask me to give a one line comment about the movie,
‘It is a sci-fi movie with equal amount of action, technology, love, emotion and with a message’.
Damn, sounds like a director’s comment on his Vijay starrer (except for the Sci-fi part)
Happy new year to you all.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Societal Metrics
Part of growing up is the ability to ask questions with the intention of feeding your reasoning. A lot of things we do are out of practice, than necessity. At a point in life I have realised that the practice itself has become a necessity, to continue to remain in the society. This is a common thought, at least among the current generation.
We do get carried away with this thought and at times start branding people who belong to the “other” as barbaric, narrow minded and so on.
We have seen this happening throughout history. Whenever the British entered a country, they called the natives barbaric or uneducated. WHY? because for them to be literate, is to be educated. To worship what they worshipped, is civilised. This is not uniquely British, but may be an acquired human nature because of our other nature – We humans are social animals.
Just because some one is not ok wearing what most others are wearing, that person is branded as narrow minded. So to avoid becoming an outcast, most of us do what most of us do. This spills over to even what we think about. So much so that we start feeling guilty if we think or look at things differently. I don’t know how anybody can be called selfish if they do 90% of things for others. (Anyway I would like to discuss the term ‘selfishness’ in one of my articles in future)
Sure there will come a day when every person does what he/she wants to do and feels good doing it, and the person next door has no problem with it as long as it is within the country’s constitutional boundaries.
Anyway, this is just a random thought out of my mind. I just felt like writing.
-- Satish